: The High Court of London ruled that Irving had "persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence" to suit his pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic ideological agenda.
| Edition Details | Information | | :--- | :--- | | | La guerra de Hitler | | Original Title | Hitler's War | | Author | David Irving | | Language | Spanish (Castellano) | | Translator | Andrés Bosch | | Publisher | Editorial Planeta (Spain) | | Year of Publication | 1980 (with later reprints) | | Number of Pages | 672 pages | | ISBN (first Spanish edition) | 978-84-320-6607-8 | : The High Court of London ruled that
This framing is a crucial element of the book's appeal and its danger. By adopting the language of objective inquiry, the Spanish edition can present a deeply one-sided and falsified account as a courageous alternative to "official" history, a tactic that has attracted fascist groups and readers seeking to question the established historical record. It portrays Hitler as a rational, intelligent politician
It portrays Hitler as a rational, intelligent politician who was often let down by incompetent or treasonous subordinates. Searching for "david irving - hitler----s war-la guerra
David Irving’s " Hitler's War " (published in Spanish as La guerra de Hitler ) is a 1977 book attempting to portray the conflict solely from the German perspective, which has been universally condemned by mainstream historians for distorting evidence to argue that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust. The work, along with its Spanish-language digital versions, is recognized as a central document of Holocaust denial and historical negationism, notably discredited during the 2000 Irving v Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt trial.
Searching for "david irving - hitler----s war-la guerra de hitler -castellano-.pdf" is not inherently wrong if your goal is critical study. But go in with open eyes: the PDF contains meticulously woven falsehoods. Read it alongside refutations like Lying About Hitler by Richard J. Evans (based on the 2000 trial). The true history of Hitler’s war—including his direct responsibility for genocide—is well documented and far more horrifying than any revisionist fantasy.
The high court ruled against Irving. The presiding judge, Justice Charles Gray, concluded that Irving had "significantly misrepresented and distorted the historical evidence" to portray Hitler in an unwarrantedly favorable light. The court explicitly declared Irving to be an active Holocaust denier, anti-Semite, and racist who manipulated historical data to serve his ideological prejudices. Following the trial, mainstream academic publishers dropped Irving, and his reputation as a legitimate historian was permanently destroyed. The Digital Search: "La Guerra de Hitler" in Spanish