Doe Season By David Michael Kaplan Full Text Updated Jun 2026

David Michael Kaplan's "Doe Season" is a thought-provoking and nuanced exploration of adolescence, identity, and morality. The author's intentions can be inferred as follows:

Doe Season is a quietly tense literary novel about family, identity, and the moral complexities of survival. Kaplan tracks the unraveling of a small-town life through spare, observant prose and a steady accumulation of ethical dilemmas. Doe Season By David Michael Kaplan Full Text

To fully appreciate "Doe Season," it is helpful to understand its author. David Michael Kaplan was born in New York City in 1946. He graduated from Yale University (BA, 1967) and later earned his MFA from the prestigious Iowa Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa (1987). He is a professor emeritus of English at Loyola University Chicago, where he directed the Creative Writing Program for many years. David Michael Kaplan's "Doe Season" is a thought-provoking

Art is the nightmare version of masculinity that Mac is not—loud, boastful, cruel. His story about shooting a doe and finding her fawn dead beside her is a warning Andy heeds. Art represents the hunting world’s indifference to suffering. To fully appreciate "Doe Season," it is helpful

The story is widely available in many high school and college literature anthologies, such as The Norton Introduction to Literature and Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing .

Kaplan's story is dense with symbols that function as a complex psychological landscape for Andy's transformation.

| Element | Details | |---------|---------| | | First‑person, unnamed, a middle‑aged wildlife biologist who works for a state agency. | | Setting | The remote forests of northern New Hampshire, during the late‑summer “doe season” (the period when hunting licenses permit the harvesting of female deer). | | Plot Overview | The narrator is tasked with a routine population‑control survey: counting does, estimating fawn survival, and issuing recommendations to the state wildlife board. While trekking through a stand of red spruce, he encounters an elderly hunter, Earl “Pike” McAllister , who is out of season, carrying a loaded shotgun and a limp. The two strike an uneasy conversation about the ethics of hunting, the loss of wilderness to development, and the narrator’s own strained relationship with his late father, a legendary hunter. As the day wanes, the narrator discovers a fresh set of tracks—two sets of fresh deer prints intersecting with a set of human footprints that end abruptly. The story ends with the narrator hearing a single, distant gunshot and feeling “the forest inhale.” | | Resolution | The story does not resolve the mystery of the missing hunter; instead, it leaves the reader with an ambiguous sense of responsibility, both personal (the narrator’s complicity in a system that kills) and ecological (the fragile balance of the forest). |